Skip to main content

Group: For Academics

Science and Society: Open Science and Citizen Science in Aurora

Written by Aniza Pourtauborde on . Posted in News.

Aurora recognizes the transformative power of science to address societal challenges through openness and collaboration. Through the Aurora 2030 programme, a dedicated task team on  Science and Society focuses on  advancing both Open Science and Citizen Science, two interconnected approaches that together foster a more inclusive, sustainable, and impactful research ecosystem.

A recent survey launched by the task team yielded comprehensive results from 250 respondents across Aurora universities. Representing a broad spectrum of roles within the academic community, the survey results showed that Open Science and Citizen Science initiatives are currently gaining momentum within each institution.

Despite different levels of institutional engagement, the survey highlighted the potential for continuing growth in Open Science and Citizen Science practices. Key development areas include increasing financial and infrastructural support, ensuring formal recognition of contributions, and providing training to overcome technical and time-related barriers.

Addressing the above challenges can help universities to further enhance the role of Open Science and Citizen Science in solving societal problems, fostering innovation, and promoting public engagement with science.

“Overcoming barriers to participation requires a comprehensive approach,” says Roberto Delle Donne, Professor at University Federico II of Naples and lead for the Aurora  Science and Society task team. “Universities must invest in robust training programs, streamline infrastructure for accessibility, and formalize recognition of contributions to Open Science and Citizen Science. Equally important is fostering partnerships between researchers and communities, empowering citizens to co-create knowledge and address shared challenges.”

Open Science and Citizen Science: A Synergistic Relationship

Open Science and Citizen Science are deeply associated with one another. Open Science promotes transparency, accessibility, and collaboration by ensuring that research outputs—data, publications, and methods—are openly shared. Citizen Science complements this by actively involving the public in the research process, from defining problems to collecting data and disseminating results. Together, Open Science and Citizen Science  democratize knowledge creation, breaking down barriers between researchers and society.

Citizen Science thrives in the Open Science ecosystem, which provides the tools, data, and frameworks necessary for effective public participation. Conversely, Citizen Science enriches Open Science by incorporating diverse perspectives, fostering innovation, and addressing real-world problems that resonate with communities. Many of these problems, such as environmental challenges, align with broader goals of sustainable development.

“Sharing scientific knowledge with the general public in creative ways, for instance through Art and Science exhibitions and hands-on demonstrations, creates a strong and lasting sense of awareness and curiosity that can have a major impact on how society responds to the environmental challenges we face,” says Helena Cruz de Carvalho, Associate Professor at Université Paris-Est Créteil (UPEC) and Institut de Biologie de l’Ecole Normale Supérieure (IBENS). 

Towards a Science for Society

By intertwining Open Science and Citizen Science, Aurora is building a research culture that is green, transparent, inclusive, and ethically conscious. The focus on sustainability is reflected in the methods employed and in the topics that are addressed, such as climate change, resource management, and societal well-being.

To this end, the Aurora Science and Society task team focuses on four key objectives:

  • Building Knowledge: Developing a repository of best practices for Open Science and Citizen Science, drawing from diverse disciplines and experiences across  Aurora universities.
  • Empowering Researchers and Students: Creating training modules to equip researchers and students with the skills to engage in open, participatory, and FAIR ((Findable – Accessible – Interoperable – Reusable)-aligned research.
  • Connecting Communities: Establishing inclusive networks that unite Aurora institutions with local and international communities, fostering collaboration and mutual learning.
  • Engaging Citizens: Encouraging public involvement in addressing societal and environmental challenges through workshops, events, and the creation of communities ofpractice.

The goals above catalyse the efforts undertaken by Aurora universities to ensure that science is not only conducted for society, but also with society, creating a shared path toward sustainable development and innovation.

A Conversation with Rina Alluri: Peace and Peacebuilding In An Era of Global Incertitude

Written by Aniza Pourtauborde on . Posted in News.

During the Aurora International Peace Conference 2025 hosted by Universität Innsbruck, academic and researcher Rina Alluri unpacked the meaning of peace and peacebuilding in today’s global context. She further showcased how higher education institutions can play a significant role in writing the narrative in promoting the culture of peace through educational initiatives, activities and policies.

This conversation was led by Niels Hexspoor, Aurora Sustainability and Impact Leader at Palacký University Olomouc and Lead for Aurora 2030 Work Package 7 (WP7) Capacity Building and Community Engagement. He interviewed Rina Alluri, Assistant Professor in Peace and Conflict Studies at the Universität Innsbruck, and UNESCO Chair for Peace Studies. She was also part of the organising committee for the Aurora International Peace Conference 2025, an event coordinated under the Aurora Karazin University Peace Education Hub.

Setting the Stage: The Meaning of Peace

Niels: We are here today at the Aurora International Peace Conference on “The Role Of Higher Education And Peace Building” hosted by the University of Innsbruck as part of the Aurora Karazin University Peace Education Hub. Peace is a very loaded and concurrent topic. Could you give some examples of the meaning of peace, especially in the context of today’s world?

Rina:  We often think that peace is a sort of this end goal, a destination, this utopian place that we are all supposed to be somewhat striving for, or moving towards. While I do believe that there is something to strive for and move towards, we need to understand peace and peacebuilding as an ongoing lifelong learning process. As individuals, but also as societies, institutions, universities, we must think about how we’re building different forms of peace everyday.

Unfortunately, we are living in turbulent times. I try not to be a pessimist, but we need to be aware of the different realities: at the moment, there are a number of countries, contexts, and communities around the world that are facing threat, risks, insecurity, and that are fearful for their everyday lives.

So when we look at peace and peacebuilding, it’s a matter of acknowledging the reality of war, conflict, genocide, mass atrocities, and humanitarian crises, but also always keeping in mind the opportunities for building everyday forms of peace.

The Role of Higher Education in Peacebuilding

Niels: How do you think universities in higher education institutions, such as those within Aurora, play a role in creating academics and students that can positively contribute to raising this awareness and this sense of peacebuilding?

Rina: There’s an element of also being aware of the possible negative role that education has played historically in some cases. This is something that I feel is very important when we speak about our students. I co-lead a Master’s programme in Peace and Conflict Studies. Although I’m not a historian, I’m a political scientist, and I think that political histories are important to be aware of. In order to find ways for universities to contribute to peace and peacebuilding, we must also be aware of how they have contributed to conflict, and how often education has been part of colonisation, imperialism, et cetera.

Finding the way for universities is also being very aware of the potential of education, how it can be used as a tool – and is being used as a tool in some contexts today – for oppression, manipulation, indoctrination, erasure, and revisionist policies and approaches. When we begin from that starting point of how education and universities have been used as negative tools, and we come into the conversation with that absolute clear awareness, we can then begin to consider the potential opportunities.

We see examples of this all around the world. For little girls in Afghanistan and Pakistan historically, education has been a tool for resistance. We see in the cases of higher education institutions that offer scholarships to students from the global south and conflict-affected context in the global north, how these opportunities would only exist through scholarships and educational spaces.

We can also see today, being together in a conference that gathers scholars, activists, practitioners, students, to talk about the role of higher education and peace building. Through this contact and meeting with each other, we speak a common language of cooperation, community, and how to find ways to work together. Developing peace hubs, Erasmus exchanges in the context of Europe, but also being aware of the challenges that students and scholars at risk face around the world and trying to identify ways to support each other through it.

Full house at the Aurora International Peace Conference 2025 for the plenary session on “Universities’ Peacebuilding Practices and Knowledge Diplomacy”

The Transformative Power of Education

Niels: You’d mentioned some of the more practical ways that were touched upon in this conference and, ways in which universities can use this transformative power for good rather than for bad. Could you perhaps give some concrete and practical examples to how this can translate to everyday life?

Rina: As I mentioned, I co-lead a Master’s programme in Peace and Conflict Studies. One of the challenges that we often face is students from conflict-affected contexts or from global south contexts, look to opportunities for education.

Here we need to be better. We need to be better at ensuring that not only are we offering scholarships for students to come here, but also how we are supporting them once they are here. How are we ensuring that they have – from a technical level – access to visas, housing, communities? How are we offering a sense of belonging?

Peacebuilding is that step: how are we offering spaces of belonging that people are not just studying in a room together or in a big institution, but that they are also having meaningful – sometimes difficult – conversations, and allowing those conversations to be had.

In the last few days, we’ve been inspired with some incredible keynote speakers. One of them spoke about bringing ourselves into the classroom. As an educator and professor, we have a responsibility to bring ourselves into the classroom. So not just expecting students to show up, with vulnerability, ideas, and questions, but also ourselves to show up with vulnerability, ideas, and questions. For us to be aware of, and aim to, dismantle power hierarchies that exist between students and professors.

We should also question our pedagogy. We speak of all different types of pedagogy, whether it’s decolonial, intersectional, anti-racist, democratic, civil-centered, global citizenship, student-focused, et cetera. All these pedagogies are great on paper, but how are we actually bringing them into the classroom and ensuring that classroom spaces can enter into dialogue with one another?

That’s just a classroom space, which is one option, but another is through meaningful exchanges. Aurora universities, and peace hub platforms, offer such exchange between students. I don’t want to diminish contact theory here, as I believe the opportunity for students to meet each other, to meet people who might actually have different backgrounds, opinions, perspectives, to allow for that pluriversal conversation, is really crucial.

Keynote speakers, from left to right: Ian Manzi, Beatrix Austin, Madeleine Rees, Frank Geary, Marko Lehti, Oleksandra Matviichuk, Savo Heleta and Norbert Koppensteiner

Adapting Knowledge Development for Sustainable Peace

Niels: You mentioned bringing oneself into the classroom, both from the perspectives of an educator and a student. Could you elaborate on what that could look like, for example, in relation to the different layers of interaction and lasting impact of peace and conflict?

Rina: One of the biggest challenges that we face in knowledge creation, knowledge development and knowledge extraction at the moment, is that very often we still fall back into that idea that knowledge is supposed to be rational. That it’s supposed to be neutral, void of voice, and void of identity.

While that may be relevant, particularly in certain disciplines, that may also require a certain type of neutrality from a technical point of view. In the social sciences and the humanities, and peace and conflict studies, we cannot pretend that this is the case. If we are engaging in conflicts – whether these might happen at a personal, internal, interpersonal or relational level, but also exposure to actual, armed conflicts and war zones – we can’t pretend that our own identities and ideas are not also entering into that space.

I’ll give you a very concrete example. I’ve been doing my PhD in postdoc research in, and on, Sri Lanka and post-war Sri Lanka, in the immediate place. As a researcher being also from the Asian continent, I have to be aware of how, if I step into a room – in the case of Sri Lanka – how that has relational impact. My identity as an Asian, but also as a woman, as someone who has been raised in the global north and the global south, has an impact on how I’m allowed to ask questions, if I even get an interview at all, and how that person responds to those questions.

We often think that, we can just create a semi-structured interview guide: you email someone, you have an interview, you ask questions, you leave, you analyse your data, you write your academic research. When we’re working in conflict-affected context, when we’re dealing with also vulnerable realities, trauma, we have to be so sensitive to how those interactions actually work, and how access to persons and stories, are also so vulnerable to change.

This is one of the aspects I want to bring in here. As researchers, pedagogues, and educators, we need to be aware of how who we are does have an impact, even if we don’t want it to, even if we would hope that someone enters a room and is neutral of identity, race, gender, class, cast, et cetera, it’s very often not the case.

So this is, for me, an invitation. An invitation to be aware of who we are and how we affect those around us. How that influences how we ask questions, how we engage in conversation, but also how we practice peace.

If we’re not aware of that reality and we assume neutrality and rationality, then we’re also not aware of the impact that that may have on persons that we’re engaging with.

This conversation is part of a series called “A Conversation With…” undertaken within the framework of the Aurora 2030 programme supported by the European Commission. It is an interview format that focuses on a specific topic and is meant to inspire its readers to reflect on and catalyse positive impact. The exchange is available in its original format on the Aurora YouTube channel.

LOUIS As A Transformative Force for Societal Impact

Written by Aniza Pourtauborde on . Posted in News.

As we celebrate the International Day of Education, it is important to reflect on how higher education can be a transformative force for societal impact.  

Aurora works towards this goal through its innovative approaches to teaching, such as the Learning Outcomes in University for Impact on Society (LOUIS), which fosters transversal skills essential for addressing real-world challenges. In this interview, Maria Inmaculada de Molina-Fernandez from Universitat Rovira i Virgili and participant of the LOUIS Blended Intensive Program (BIP) in Olomouc shares her insights on how collaboration and open dialogue among educators can enhance teaching practices and improve learning outcomes.

What was your BIP experience in Olomouc?

Participating in the BIP in Olomouc was an inspiring and enriching experience. Over the course of five days, I collaborated with educational experts and lecturers from a wide range of institutions, including universities and small enterprises, to discuss critical issues in education.

The discussions were focused on fundamental questions about the purpose of teaching and how to address challenges like creating a shared language across disciplines and institutions. We explored the difficulties educators face when adopting new tools like LOUIS and the complexities of assessing high-level competencies. A particularly meaningful topic was the use of LOUIS as a tool for self-reflection, helping educators refine their teaching practices. 

The open and engaging atmosphere encouraged participants to exchange ideas freely, leading to valuable insights into how LOUIS could unify educational frameworks and empower both teachers and students. This experience reinforced the importance of collaboration in addressing shared challenges in education. 

Do you currently use LOUIS in any of your curricula?

While I do not currently use the LOUIS competency framework, I believe its implementation could significantly enrich our educational offer. It can clearly define learning objectives, making expectations more transparent for students, and foster essential competencies such as problem-solving, critical thinking, and effective communication. Additionally, LOUIS supports more robust and fair assessment methods. Its flexibility allows it to adapt to the specific needs of different subjects and institutions, promoting collaboration and enhancing both teaching and learning outcomes.

What are your key takeaways from this BIP?

The BIP highlighted the value of LOUIS as a structured yet adaptable framework to develop transversal skills such as communication, ethical reasoning, and lifelong learning. Based on the VALUE approach by the AACU, LOUIS offers tools that guide students’ learning progression and emphasizes qualitative feedback over rigid assessments.

One of its strengths is its ability to break down competencies into sub-competencies that align with diverse disciplines and provide progressive descriptors to help educators and students track growth. By focusing on a small set of sub-competencies, educators can tailor their use of LOUIS to their teaching objectives and integrate it effectively into classroom tasks. The framework offers clarity on learning goals, helping students achieve measurable and meaningful outcomes. 

How do you foresee implementing LOUIS in the future?

To implement LOUIS, I plan to introduce it to colleagues through a careful and systematic process. This will include assessing current curricula to identify areas of alignment, engaging with stakeholders to set clear goals, and designing modules that incorporate LOUIS competencies. I also aim to organize faculty training sessions to ensure the effective use of the LOUIS Framework. Initially, I would pilot this approach in select courses to gather feedback and make necessary adjustments before expanding it further. My goal is to create a collaborative culture that uses LOUIS to prepare students with the cross-cutting competencies they need for future success.

Would you recommend this BIP?

I would highly recommend this BIP to educators. It provides practical strategies for helping students develop essential soft skills, which are increasingly valued by employers. The program equips teachers to foster critical thinking, teamwork, and other transferable competencies, enhancing classroom interactions and better preparing students for future challenges.

Looking Back: Aurora Research and Innovation Conference

Written by Anna Klas on . Posted in News.

The Aurora Research and Innovation (RI) Conference occurred on Friday, 20 September, at the Muntpunt Library in Brussels. The event brought together 40 experts from the Aurora RI community and external stakeholders across Europe. It highlighted Aurora RI’s achievements and explored future opportunities for European University Alliances within the broader European Research and Innovation agenda.

The conference followed an Aurora RI working meeting held on Thursday, September 19, at the Czech Liaison Office in Brussels. As a result, this meeting set the stage for the discussions during the conference.

Morning Highlights: Celebrating Aurora RI Achievements

The day began with introductory speeches by Ramon Puras, Aurora Secretary-General, and Freyja Oddsdottir, Aurora RI Project Manager. Next, Svandís Halldorsdottir, Head of the Grants Office at the University of Iceland, followed with a presentation on the “Roadmap for Convergence of Research Support Schemes,” which highlighted Aurora’s long-term vision and support for the Aurora RI Project’s outcomes.

One of the morning’s key sessions was titled “Highlights – Aurora Research and Innovation.” It focused on Aurora’s achievements in three key areas:

Afternoon Highlights: Looking to the Future

In the afternoon, the focus gradually shifted to future prospects, beginning with a master class from Doris Alexander, Executive Board Member at Charm-EU, which notably outlined strategic funding avenues for European universities. In addition, Doris stated: “Alliances could serve as ‘testbeds’ for future EU policy, which would consequently require a more proactive approach, for example, through networks like ForEU4all.” Therefore, this presentation effectively set the tone for the afternoon’s exploration of new opportunities.

Next, these insights were followed by a panel discussion on the prospects for research and innovation within European Universities. The session covered several key topics:

  • The need to build and maintain research infrastructures across alliances.
  • Better integration of research and education, advocating for integrated funding schemes and long-term commitment.

Moderated by Helena Acheson, Europe Director at University Innovations Global (UI Global), the panel included expert insights from Olga Wessels (Head of the ECIU Brussels office and Coordinator FOR-EU and FOR-EU4ALL), Ludovic Thilly (Coordinator General of EC2U, Coordinator FOR-EU2), and Jorge Molina Martinez (Project Adviser at European Commission, Research Executive Agency (REA). The speakers provided valuable insights into the challenges and opportunities that lie ahead.

Closing and Networking

The conference ended with insightful remarks from Aurora Secretary-General Ramon Puras and Halldor Jonsson, Director of Science & Innovation at the University of Iceland. They acknowledged the strong performance of the R&I project, emphasised the importance of maintaining and expanding the research infrastructures established, and stressed Aurora’s proactive role, along with its sister alliances, in advocating for better integration of research and education. The conference concluded with a networking reception, fostering ongoing dialogue and building new connections.

This successful event reinforced the importance of collaboration within the Aurora network and the broader European Research and Innovation community, laying the groundwork for future endeavours in university alliances.

SDG-Oriented Research and Education in Transdisciplinary Hubs

Written by Aniza Pourtauborde on . Posted in News.

The new millennium is the first “urban millennium”: more people live in cities and towns than in the countryside, and urban settings are now the core sites of economic growth and social interactions. At the same time, too many urban dwellers lack access to public green spaces, public transportation, education, or health care. These are some of the fundamental changes addressed by Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 11 of the United Nations’ Agenda 2030 (U.N., Transforming Our World, 2015). And these are changes that need to be studied by students and researchers alike.

How Can Universities Contribute to SDG 11. Sustainable Cities and Communities?

The SDG 11 calls on academic research and education to help “make cities and human settlements inclusive, safe, resilient, and sustainable.” It lists cultural production, education, sports, and mental and physical health among the factors that improve the livability of cities. Aurora scholars, students, and professionals in the fields of literature, culture, society, and medicine ask: what does it take to intervene in urban change, especially if this intervention comes at the very point at which a concrete city becomes a better or a worse place for its human and non-human inhabitants?

There is a new sense that literature and the arts might play a bigger role than previously understood. Novels, poems, pamphlets, films, artwork, music: they all have a special license to connect the past to the present and to the future in fresh and sometimes startling ways. These cultural products explore the uses and consequences of history, they envision a different, formerly untold past, and they imagine a radically new future. And they might be able to change urban planning processes. As Simone d’Antonio, a member of the EU-funded project URBACT suggests, “[s]torytelling is a key tool for improving any urban planning process, both for engaging residents in different dimensions of the spatial regeneration as for helping professionals in better understanding users’ needs”. But how and in what ways has storytelling become crucial to these concise historical, social, and economic interventions? And how can the Aurora European university alliance leverage the power of storytelling to work towards healthy cities?

At the invitation of Barbara Buchenau from University of Duisburg-Essen (UDE), lead of Aurora 2030 Work Package 2 and director of the City Scripts graduate research group funded by the Volkswagen Foundation, the two-day Scripting Futures for Urban Sustainability symposium pursued two interconnected goals:

  • First, concerning the proclaimed power of storytelling, key findings were presented from the city scripts research concerning the urban impact of a limited set of stories told about postindustrial cities in the United States and Germany. In examining “legacy cities” (Mallach/Brachman, 2013) like those affected by extractive economies of coal and steel, it was found that the narratives surrounding these places have significant implications for the kinds of futures that become possible. Visions of decline and stories of resilience often equally determine how communities engage with the urban transformations to be mastered. These examples illustrate storytelling’s contradictory roles in all attempts to ‘flip the script’ of any given neighborhood.
  • Second, the symposium drew on the expertise of Aurora researchers, students and stakeholders as well as international contributors to explore the potential of concrete changes in urban health management, in urban sports, and planning practice to actually “script” the direction of future social transformations (see Sulimma / Buchenau / Gurr 2023). Together, the task was set to find answers to the following question: What are the chances and the stakes of telling convincing stories about health, sports, and urban planning that allow a fair and equitable contribution to real urban change?

Welcome Address by Barbara Buchenau

Symposium on Scripting Futures for Urban Sustainability

The symposium “Scripting Futures for Urban Sustainability” took place on June 6-7, 2024, at the University of Duisburg-Essen and the College for Social Sciences and Humanities, Essen. This event, generously funded by the Volkswagen Foundation and UDE’s Förderverein, concluded the work of the City Scripts Graduate Research Group (2018-2024) and it launched the Healthy Cities Initiative of the Aurora Transdisciplinary Educational Hubs Culture: Identities and Diversities, and Health & Well-Being.

The symposium brought together 88 participants, including researchers, students, and professionals from the humanities, social sciences, and medical fields, to explore the crucial, yet complex role of storytelling in urban planning and sustainability. The event featured a public lecture by Aurora Fellow for Health and Well-being Marcus Zepf from Université Paris-Est Créteil (UPEC) on “Adaptable and Healthy Cities: Permanent Autopoietic Process,” presentations by researchers from Università Federico II of Naples, Palacký University Olomouc and UDE, a critical intervention by Deputy Mayor of Essen Simone Raskob, and a comparative perspective provided by two members of UNIC, a European university alliance focusing on industrial cities. Additionally, talks by 19 international researchers, a visit by a student delegation from Johns Hopkins University led by the historian Victoria Harms, a book launch, and networking opportunities offered much food for thought.

Students played an active role throughout both days as presenters, interviewers, and critical voices who offered fresh perspectives on the core research question. They directed a poster presentation that showcased their own research in the field, they conducted interviews with participants, and they contributed to discussions with a critical eye, challenging assumptions and proposing new approaches to sustainable urban development.

Students as Critics of Academic Writers. Left to Right: Pia Schümmelfelder (MA student UDE), Jens Gurr (editor of City Scripts, 2023, UDE), Barbara Buchenau (editor of City Scripts, 2023, UDE), and Dana Sitnikov (MA student UDE)

Learning and Research for Healthy Cities

After the event, Mona Gutmann and Jacqueline Ruffen, M.A. students of American Studies at the University of Duisburg-Essen, presented an insightful report on the two-day event. They emphasized key themes and discussion points, focusing especially on the transatlantic comparison between the U.S. Rust Belt and Germany’s Ruhr region. Gutmann and Ruffen examined how both areas coped with deindustrialization and urban transformation. They used their own learning experience to explain the role of storytelling in urban planning, providing a poem by Mona Gutmann to show exemplarily how literature, street art, and architecture can help to bring about more sustainable and inclusive futures.

Additionally, they stressed the symposium’s alignment with UN SDG 11, showing where concrete paths towards inclusive and sustainable urbanization had been mapped out. Gutmann and Ruffen were particularly impressed by discussions on urban health management, gender sensitivity in medical care, and the role of visual and narrative arts in urban interventions. Their report emphasizes the importance of community involvement in urban planning, asking especially for processes that respect and integrate local histories and identities in redevelopment and revitalization projects.

To continue the work begun during the symposium, there will be a student-driven Aurora research workshop titled “Scripting Urban Resilience” hosted by Florian Freitag, Barbara Buchenau, and Zohra Hassan-Pieper in Essen at the College for Social Sciences and Humanities on 15 October 2024. Additionally, Barbara Buchenau (UDE) and Marcus Zepf (UPEC) will conduct an Aurora summer school 2025 called “Scripting Healthy Cities” to further explore sustainable and adaptable urban environments.

Brainstorming for Future European Transdisciplinary Research and Education. Left to Right, Anke Hinney (University Hospital Essen), Marcus Zepf (École d’Urbanisme de Paris, UPEC), Petra Günther (International Office, UDE) and Barbara Buchenau (Faculty of the Humanities, UDE)

Seven Innovative Projects Selected After First Aurora Call for Incentive and Collaborative Research Projects

Written by Aniza Pourtauborde on . Posted in News.

Launched in February 2024, Aurora’s first Call for Incentive and Collaborative Research Projects received 26 high-quality applications from all institutions within Aurora, gathering the expertise of 87 research groups from diverse disciplines. Seven projects made the final cut and will receive funding over the next two years. 

The 2024 Call for Incentive and Collaborative Research Projects has been created under Task 5.2 on Academic Collaboration and Community Building of the Aurora 2030 programme supported through the European Universities Initiative by the European Commission. This annual call aims to offer opportunities for young and established academics to further enhance research cooperation within Aurora universities.  

The research proposals funded within the framework of this call have been evaluated on a challenging list of criteria, including their scientific quality, originality and feasibility. Projects also had to demonstrate their added value for the Aurora 2030 programme, in particular their potential to create scientific communities, and, if relevant for their topic, to contribute to the Aurora hubs.

Innovative Projects Make Their Mark 

Following a thorough evaluation process and difficult choices to be made, the Aurora Research Council (ARC) finally selected seven potentially innovative projects for a total available funding of €104,000, counting an average of €15,000 per project. Due to the success of this inaugural call, this amount has indeed been redefined to fund more projects than anticipated. The results of the evaluation have been later confirmed by the Vice-rectors for Research from Aurora universities.    

Funded projects will begin in autumn 2024 and run for the next two years. Without a doubt, success of these projects, and that of the researchers’ scientific work, will enrich the Aurora community and further contribute to the progress within the Aurora hubs. 

Below is the list of successful projects. Detailed information for each project will be made available soon on this website.The results for the Call for Incentive and Collaborative Research Projects 2024 are an encouraging start to fostering tangible, robust scientific and academic collaboration and communities in Aurora universities. Following this initial success, a second call will be launched in early 2025.  In view of the large number of high-quality projects submitted, Aurora hopes to secure more funding for this action in the future.

Get in touch with the office of the Aurora Research Council.

New Aurora Research Council Debates Proposals for Aurora Annual Call for Incentive Research Collaboration

Written by Aniza Pourtauborde on . Posted in News.

Created in May 2024, the Aurora Research Council (ARC) is a cross-disciplinary committee represented by senior researchers from Aurora member universities and student representatives.

Developed under the Aurora 2030 Work Package 5 for Enhancing Quality of Research Through An Aurora Research and Innovation Community, the Aurora Research Council (ARC) is conceived as part of Task 5.2 on Academic Collaboration and Community Building. The ARC comprises two senior researchers from each of the nine Aurora member universities. Its responsibility is to evaluate and select proposals submitted following the annual Call for Incentive Research Collaboration.

Today, the ARC counts 18 members, plus Professor Matthias Beekmann of Université Paris-Est Créteil (UPEC), who leads Task 5.2 and acts as the council President. Members come from different academic disciplines ranging from analytical chemistry, astrophysics, law, health and life sciences, to economic sciences, history, and archeology. The ARC’s cross-disciplinarity enables a wider perspective for a 360-degree evaluation of the received proposals. The council is completed by two student representatives (designated by Aurora’s student council).

Successful First Annual Call for Incentive Research Collaboration

Launched in February 2024, Aurora’s first annual Call for Incentive Research Collaboration generated 42 applications from universities within Aurora. These applications responded to the following key actions:

  • Key Action 1: Incentive and Collaborative Research Projects

Concrete exploratory research activities emphasising [MB1] the complementarity of diverse competencies and approaches resulting from research cooperation.

  • Key Action 2: Thematic Summer Schools

Provide opportunities for early-stage researchers (Master 2, Phd and postdocs) to develop their careers, share knowledge and build a professional network through disciplinary training.

  • Key Action 3: Short-term Research Secondments for Early-stage Researchers

Short-term mobility of up to three months in a research laboratory or unit of Aurora member universities with the aim to foster academic collaboration between Aurora  research units, and again helping young researchers in career development.

General criteria for the selection of proposals include  their scientific quality, originality and novelty.. In addition, candidates must develop a strong argumentation for the Aurora added value of the intended collaboration and community building.

More specifically for Key Action 1, their proposals should show how they aim to build the Aurora Research and Innovation community. For Key Actions 1 and 2, it is mandatory for candidates to involve researchers from three member universities within Aurora.

“The ARC was delighted by the generally high quality of the proposals received, the large range of disciplines covered, the fact that intended collaborations between groups from partner universities and contributions to AURORA hubs were well put forward,” says Matthias Beekmann.

Rigorous Evaluation Process

The ARC has met two times since the closing of the call at the end of April 2024. The first meeting took place online. During this meeting, council members established the evaluation process and designated reviewers for the 42 submitted proposals (two for each project in Key Actions 1 and 2; one for Key Action 3 projects) .

The second meeting was held in-person at the end of June 2024 in UPEC, with one representative per university being physically present, while others connected to the meeting online. The objective of this day-and-a-half meeting was to discuss, assess and select projects for funding for those who have succeeded in meeting the criteria set in the call. The selection of the ARC is to be approved by Aurora’s Vice-rectors for Research (VRRs) in August 2024. Announcement of successful proposals will take place at the beginning of the next academic year 2024/2025.

Education and Research in Health and Well-being: A Conversation with Lina Penagos and Pasquale Maffia

Written by Aniza Pourtauborde on . Posted in News.

During the Aurora Spring Biannual 2024, academics and researchers Barbara Buchenau, Lina Penagos and Pasquale Maffia engaged in a conversation on health and well-being, joint education and how new study programmes can be invented, in which not only students and educators are involved, but also researchers, stakeholders and professionals in the fields for which our students are being trained. They will also discuss how research plays a critical role in creating innovative programmes using a transdisciplinary approach.

This conversation was led by Barbara Buchenau, professor of North American Studies from the University of Duisburg-Essen and Lead for Aurora 2030 Work Package 2 (WP2) for Transdisciplinary European Research-driven Educational Hubs. She interviewed Pasquale Maffia, professor of Cardiovascular Immunology at the University of Glasgow in the United Kingdom and professor of Pharmacology at the Università Federico II of Naples (UNINA). Pasquale leads Task 2.3 on Establishing the Hub for Health & Well-Being within WP2, alongside Co-lead Lina Penagos, researcher in the field of Peace and Development, as well as Project Manager of EUR-LIVE project at the Université Paris-Est Créteil (UPEC).

Transdisciplinarity in Education and Research in Health and Well-being

Barbara: Today, we’re here with Lina Penagos from UPEC and Pasquale Maffia from UNINA. I’m Barbara Buchenau from the University of Duisburg-Essen in Germany. What we have here is a sociologist, someone in the medical field, and me in cultural studies. The three of us are trying to do something in the Health and Well-being hub, trying to improve our education in health and well-being, and trying to wrap our minds around the fact that education in health and well-being is always a national affair.

Although health and well-being do not really care for national borders, our educational systems do. What needs to change in our education and in our research? Lina, what would you say is the most pressing element in what you’re doing right now?

Lina: What we’re facing are complex problems, and it is important to educate and train people in transdisciplinary thinking and methodology. To enable this, we need to combine our forces, which is what we’re doing within this hub. This is a very good example: I’m a political scientist, Pasquale is in pharmacology, and you’re in cultural studies.

In Paris, we have many examples of people in medicine and people working on cultural issues, who need to share their work with others to be able to respond to our societal challenges. For instance, we have students from different disciplines – environment, sociology and medicine – who have successfully worked together by trying to solve specific vulnerability issues.

Barbara: So it’s not that we’re trying to unlearn our disciplinary languages, but that we’re trying to learn to use our disciplinary languages across disciplines to allow them to address a problem together, such as urban developments in Paris, for instance.

Another example is cardiovascular health care. It’s a hugely diversified topic in terms of how it affects women and men, how it is visible in people who are dark-skinned or light-skinned. Very often, people are actually suffering from diseases because patients and doctors cannot properly identify these diseases. Pasquale, can you tell us more?

Pasquale: We’re developing some projects in Africa at the moment where we need to face the issue of working together between different disciplines in a multidisciplinary manner. Also, we need to be as inclusive as possible of the diversity present on the ground. For example, when we’re trying to implement a programme for controlling blood pressure in people living in slums, it’s impossible to have only doctors engaging with them because sometimes, people don’t always listen to doctors. So, we need to engage with local stakeholders and social scientists who can explain to us the diversity and priorities for these specific social settings.

Today, working together within different disciplines and in a global environment is fundamental. Translating all of this at the teaching level and interacting with students is crucial. This is what we are trying to do with the Health and Well-being hub in Aurora.

Workshop on Vulnerability

Barbara: At the Aurora Spring Biannual, we held a workshop where many disciplines, students, and stakeholders came together. How are we able to talk together as professionals in cultural studies, humanities, medical field, and social sciences?

Lina: We’re trying to build things. Together. Building things together requires the participation of everyone – stakeholders, researchers and students. Students are at the heart of what we’re doing. During this Workshop on Vulnerability, we had the opportunity to learn from different experiences from researchers, and students who are studying vulnerability and aging, which is also a societal issue.

It was important to share each other’s experiences in these fields during the workshop. It helped us to understand, first from a scientific point of view, and then, how to collaborate and cooperate in pedagogical elements so that we can build joint programmes and courses together, which is the aim of our activities in the Health and Well-being hub in Aurora.

Barbara: During the workshop, we also organised “lunch trains” as a way to connect people across disciplines and across student, researcher, educator, and practitioner levels. That’s just one of the ways we started conversations. For instance, in the 17th century, “vulnerability” as a concept was used to defend slavery. The term itself thus has a long cultural history that has worked well but that has also damaged a lot of human lives. I think it’s an important concept to address neutrally across the disciplines.

Bridging the Gap to Respond to Sustainable Development Goals

Barbara: Our universities are founded in regions in the middle of urban settings where urban planners find that education must be brought in to bring about positive change. That is one of the major questions for us: can education and can universities bring about positive change and contribute to the United Nation’s 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)?

Pasquale: We’re trying to address some of the 17 goals developed by the United Nations to make a better world, like health inequalities, better education, and improving health and well-being.

The Workshop on Vulnerability was held in the new building of the Università Federico II of Naples in Scampia, a socially deprived area. This was an initiative undertaken by the university to interact with areas that are less fortunate than the city of Naples. The workshop brought a lot of exchange with the local people.

Lina: UPEC is at the heart of one of the most vulnerable places in the southeast of Paris. Our philosophy is to be aligned with the SDGs. So, all our pedagogical and scientific activities are aligned with good health and well-being, gender equality, as well as the different partnerships we’re organising together.

It’s a very important contribution of us and the participants in the workshop, hoping to build things together from the experiences we share. If we’re trying to address societal issues, we need to begin from shared experiences. This is exactly what we’re doing in Aurora.

This exchange is part of a series called “A Conversation With…” undertaken within the framework of the Aurora 2030 project supported by the European Commission. It is an interview format that focuses on a specific subject and is meant to inspire its readers to act and catalyse positive impact. This conversation is available in its original format on the Aurora YouTube channel.

Martin Procházka Elected as New Aurora President

Written by Niels Hexspoor on . Posted in News.

Martin Procházka, Rector of Palacký University Olomouc, has been elected to be the new Aurora president by the Aurora General Council during the Aurora Spring Biannual 2024. He takes over from Jón Atli Benediktsson, Rector of the University of Iceland, who has held the position of Aurora President for the past four years.

Following the general council’s decision, Jón Atli Benediktsson passed on the torch in the public handover ceremony during the Biannual.  During this ceremony, Rector Procházka presented his predecessor with a vase made of Bohemian crystal to thank him for his service. “Jón Atli, this gift is not only a token of our friendship, but also a symbol of your excellent work for Aurora. Bohemian crystal, renowned for its exquisite craftsmanship, shines with the combination of tradition and innovation that we strive for at Aurora and reflects our commitment to excellence in education and research,” said Procházka.

In his acceptance speech, he emphasised that in his role as President, he wants to give the universities and all members of the community space for expression and the opportunity to shape the future Aurora and highlighted students as a key element in his vision of Aurora. “The students’ enthusiasm and their ideas are a great inspiration to us all. As President, I will aim to continue working to create a student-oriented and inclusive environment,” underlined Procházka.

Martin Procházka is the first Aurora President elected under a new system of rotating Aurora presidency. By unanimous decision of the Aurora General Council, the Aurora Presidency will rotate between the member universities. This system, inspired by the rotating EU-presidency, will allow all Aurora universities to leave their mark on Aurora’s policy and strategic decision-making.

In this system, the general council elects a rector  to serve on the Aurora board as  president-elect one year prior to them taking the mantle of Aurora President for a one-year tenure. After this year, they stay on the Aurora Board for one more year as Past President, to ensure continuity of governance.

Sustainability & Climate Change Hub Advances Micro-credentials Initiative

Written by Niels Hexspoor on . Posted in News.

At the Aurora Spring Biannual 2024 hosted by University Federico II in Naples, involving task teams 2.1 “Establishing the Hub for Sustainability & Climate Change” and 2.5 “Coordination of joint education and joint accreditation”, marked a significant step forward to discuss micro-credentials, and make flexible and individual learning paths a reality within Aurora.

A major highlight was the near-finalisation of the much-anticipated document, “Guidelines for Setting Up Aurora Micro-credentials.” During the collaborative discussion on the guidelines draft, several key points were highlighted: 

  • Further Modifications and Provisional Decisions: Members discussed potential changes and provisional decisions, planning to forward these to other task teams and the Vice-Rectors of Education (VRE). 
  • Quality Assurance and Implementation: Each institution is responsible for quality assurance, teaching, and assessment of the micro-credentials, but institutions must agree upon joint implementation, coordinated processes and issuance. 
  • Innovative Methods: The importance of innovative teaching methods that guarantee active student participation and are recognized by employers and society was highlighted. 
  • Learning outcomes: The relevance of learning outcomes and their valid verification was reaffirmed, as was the use of the different Aurora Competence Framework tools. 
  • Branding Strategy: A strong branding strategy is needed to make micro-credentials attractive and popular among students. 

The quote “To achieve great things, two things are needed: a plan, and not quite enough time” by Leonard Bernstein resonates profoundly. Thus, following the discussion on the draft document and potential future issues, both task teams established a timeline for final feedback and approval.

Members of  task teams 2.1 and 2.5 agreed to respond to the draft within two months. The final version will then be sent to the board of Vice-Rectors for Education. Additionally, the “Guidelines for Setting Up Aurora Micro-credentials” have been sent to task team 6.1 Aurora IT Development & Services to discuss IT processes for shared student data and future perspectives on digital issuing.